1995 Audi TT vs. 2001 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2001 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Audi TT would be higher. At 1,781 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Audi TT weights approximately 50 kg more than 2001 Nissan Bluebird.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 Nissan Bluebird has automatic transmission and 1995 Audi TT has manual transmission. 1995 Audi TT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Nissan Bluebird will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Audi TT | 2001 Nissan Bluebird | |
| Make | Audi | Nissan |
| Model | TT | Bluebird |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1220 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1700 mm |
