1995 Audi TT vs. 2003 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Audi TT would be higher. At 1,781 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Audi TT (150 HP) has 53 more horse power than 2003 Chevrolet Tracker. (97 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2003 Chevrolet Tracker.
Because 1995 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Chevrolet Tracker. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Audi TT (210 Nm) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm). This means 1995 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Audi TT | 2003 Chevrolet Tracker | |
| Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
| Model | TT | Tracker |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1590 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 97 HP |
| Torque | 210 Nm | 139 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 3860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2210 mm |
