1995 Audi TT vs. 2003 Mazda 6
To start off, 2003 Mazda 6 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Audi TT would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Audi TT (150 HP) has 32 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 6. (118 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 6 weights approximately 200 kg more than 1995 Audi TT.
Because 1995 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Mazda 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Audi TT (210 Nm) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda 6. (165 Nm). This means 1995 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Audi TT | 2003 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | TT | 6 |
Year Released | 1995 | 2003 |
Body Type | Coupe | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 118 HP |
Torque | 210 Nm | 165 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81.1 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 83.1 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1220 kg | 1420 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2680 mm |