1995 Audi TT vs. 2003 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2003 MCC Crossblade is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Audi TT would be higher. At 1,781 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Audi TT (150 HP) has 80 more horse power than 2003 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Audi TT weights approximately 480 kg more than 2003 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1995 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 MCC Crossblade. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Audi TT (210 Nm) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm). This means 1995 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Audi TT | 2003 MCC Crossblade | |
| Make | Audi | MCC |
| Model | TT | Crossblade |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2003 |
| Engine Size | 1781 cc | 598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 70 HP |
| Torque | 210 Nm | 102 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1220 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 2630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 1810 mm |
