1995 Audi TT vs. 2004 Caterham 7
To start off, 2004 Caterham 7 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Audi TT would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Caterham 7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Caterham 7 (200 HP) has 50 more horse power than 1995 Audi TT. (150 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Caterham 7 should accelerate faster than 1995 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Audi TT weights approximately 680 kg more than 2004 Caterham 7.
Because 1995 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Caterham 7. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Caterham 7 (224 Nm) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Audi TT. (210 Nm). This means 2004 Caterham 7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Audi TT.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Audi TT | 2004 Caterham 7 | |
| Make | Audi | Caterham |
| Model | TT | 7 |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1781 cc | 2261 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 200 HP |
| Torque | 210 Nm | 224 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 81.1 mm | 87.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 94 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1220 kg | 540 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 3310 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2230 mm |
