1995 Audi TT vs. 2006 Isuzu KB
To start off, 2006 Isuzu KB is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Audi TT would be higher. At 2,405 cc, 2006 Isuzu KB is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Audi TT (150 HP) has 24 more horse power than 2006 Isuzu KB. (126 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2006 Isuzu KB. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Isuzu KB weights approximately 680 kg more than 1995 Audi TT.
Because 1995 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Isuzu KB. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Audi TT (210 Nm) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Isuzu KB. (207 Nm). This means 1995 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Isuzu KB.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Audi TT | 2006 Isuzu KB | |
| Make | Audi | Isuzu |
| Model | TT | KB |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1781 cc | 2405 cc |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 126 HP |
| Torque | 210 Nm | 207 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 81.1 mm | 87.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 100 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1220 kg | 1900 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 3060 mm |
