1995 Audi TT vs. 2006 Renault Kangoo
To start off, 2006 Renault Kangoo is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Audi TT would be higher. At 1,781 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Audi TT (150 HP) has 86 more horse power than 2006 Renault Kangoo. (64 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2006 Renault Kangoo.
Because 1995 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Renault Kangoo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Audi TT (210 Nm) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Renault Kangoo. (160 Nm). This means 1995 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Renault Kangoo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Audi TT | 2006 Renault Kangoo | |
| Make | Audi | Renault |
| Model | TT | Kangoo |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Panel Van |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1461 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 64 HP |
| Torque | 210 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 81.1 mm | 79.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 70 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1680 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2610 mm |
