1995 Audi TT vs. 2012 Nissan Cube
To start off, 2012 Nissan Cube is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Audi TT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Audi TT would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Nissan Cube is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Audi TT (150 HP) has 28 more horse power than 2012 Nissan Cube. (122 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 2012 Nissan Cube. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Nissan Cube weights approximately 69 kg more than 1995 Audi TT.
Because 1995 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Nissan Cube. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Audi TT (210 Nm) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Nissan Cube. (172 Nm). This means 1995 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Nissan Cube.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Audi TT | 2012 Nissan Cube | |
| Make | Audi | Nissan |
| Model | TT | Cube |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 122 HP |
| Torque | 210 Nm | 172 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1220 kg | 1289 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 3980 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1694 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2530 mm |
