1995 Bentley Turbo vs. 1963 Jeep CJ5
To start off, 1995 Bentley Turbo is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Bentley Turbo is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1963 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Bentley Turbo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Bentley Turbo | 1963 Jeep CJ5 | |
| Make | Bentley | Jeep |
| Model | Turbo | CJ5 |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6750 cc | 2199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 59 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Wheelbase Size | 3070 mm | 2060 mm |
