1995 Bentley Turbo vs. 2003 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Bentley Turbo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Bentley Turbo would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Bentley Turbo is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Bentley Turbo | 2003 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Bentley | Cadillac |
| Model | Turbo | CTS |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6750 cc | 2597 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 179 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Wheelbase Size | 3070 mm | 2890 mm |
