1995 BMW 316 vs. 1962 Fiat 2300
To start off, 1995 BMW 316 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Fiat 2300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Fiat 2300 would be higher. At 2,279 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Fiat 2300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Fiat 2300 (104 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1995 BMW 316. (101 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Fiat 2300 should accelerate faster than 1995 BMW 316.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Fiat 2300 (167 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 BMW 316. (150 Nm @ 3900 RPM). This means 1962 Fiat 2300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 BMW 316.
Compare all specifications:
1995 BMW 316 | 1962 Fiat 2300 | |
Make | BMW | Fiat |
Model | 316 | 2300 |
Year Released | 1995 | 1962 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 2279 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 167 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 8.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1310 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 70 L |