1995 BMW 316 vs. 1989 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1995 BMW 316 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Toyota Celica (159 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1995 BMW 316. (101 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1989 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1995 BMW 316. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Toyota Celica weights approximately 103 kg more than 1995 BMW 316. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1995 BMW 316 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 BMW 316. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Toyota Celica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Toyota Celica (190 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 BMW 316. (150 Nm @ 3900 RPM). This means 1989 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 BMW 316.
Compare all specifications:
1995 BMW 316 | 1989 Toyota Celica | |
Make | BMW | Toyota |
Model | 316 | Celica |
Year Released | 1995 | 1989 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 159 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 190 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1413 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2380 mm |