1995 BMW 316 vs. 2003 Tata E
To start off, 2003 Tata E is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 BMW 316. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 BMW 316 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Tata E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Tata E (148 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1995 BMW 316. (101 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Tata E should accelerate faster than 1995 BMW 316. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Tata E weights approximately 64 kg more than 1995 BMW 316. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Tata E (210 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 BMW 316. (150 Nm @ 3900 RPM). This means 2003 Tata E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 BMW 316.
Compare all specifications:
1995 BMW 316 | 2003 Tata E | |
Make | BMW | Tata |
Model | 316 | E |
Year Released | 1995 | 2003 |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 210 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1374 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2810 mm |