1995 BMW 317 vs. 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne
To start off, 1995 BMW 317 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne would be higher. At 4,097 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne (110 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1995 BMW 317. (89 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne should accelerate faster than 1995 BMW 317.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne (251 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 BMW 317. (190 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 BMW 317.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 BMW 317 | 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne | |
| Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
| Model | 317 | Biscayne |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1665 cc | 4097 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 110 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Torque | 190 Nm | 251 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 1600 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 22.0:1 | 8.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5590 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3090 mm |
