1995 BMW 330 vs. 1951 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1995 BMW 330 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,422 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW 330 (193 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1951 Cadillac 62. (160 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW 330 should accelerate faster than 1951 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 357 kg more than 1995 BMW 330.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1951 Cadillac 62 (423 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 143 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 BMW 330. (280 Nm @ 3950 RPM). This means 1951 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 BMW 330.
Compare all specifications:
1995 BMW 330 | 1951 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | 330 | 62 |
Year Released | 1995 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2793 cc | 5422 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 193 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 280 Nm | 423 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3950 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 6.7:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1395 kg | 1752 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 2050 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3210 mm |