1995 BMW 330 vs. 2005 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2005 Cadillac CTS is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 BMW 330. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 BMW 330 would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 BMW 330 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Cadillac CTS (210 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1995 BMW 330. (193 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1995 BMW 330. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 197 kg more than 1995 BMW 330. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 BMW 330 (280 Nm) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Cadillac CTS. (264 Nm). This means 1995 BMW 330 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Cadillac CTS.
Compare all specifications:
1995 BMW 330 | 2005 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | 330 | CTS |
Year Released | 1995 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2792 cc | 2786 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 193 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 280 Nm | 264 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 75 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1395 kg | 1592 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1800 mm |