1995 BMW 520 vs. 1981 Zastava 132
To start off, 1995 BMW 520 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 132. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 132 would be higher. At 1,989 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 BMW 520 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW 520 (150 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 132. (106 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW 520 should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 132. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 BMW 520 weights approximately 393 kg more than 1981 Zastava 132. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 BMW 520 (190 Nm @ 4700 RPM) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 132. (142 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1995 BMW 520 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 132.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 BMW 520 | 1981 Zastava 132 | |
| Make | BMW | Zastava |
| Model | 520 | 132 |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1981 |
| Engine Size | 1989 cc | 1756 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 106 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 190 Nm | 142 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1488 kg | 1095 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1430 mm |
