1995 BMW 520 vs. 2003 Dodge Kahuna
To start off, 2003 Dodge Kahuna is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 BMW 520. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 BMW 520 would be higher. At 2,429 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Dodge Kahuna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Dodge Kahuna (212 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1995 BMW 520. (150 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Kahuna should accelerate faster than 1995 BMW 520.
Because 1995 BMW 520 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 BMW 520. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Kahuna, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Dodge Kahuna (339 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 149 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 BMW 520. (190 Nm @ 4700 RPM). This means 2003 Dodge Kahuna will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 BMW 520.
Compare all specifications:
1995 BMW 520 | 2003 Dodge Kahuna | |
Make | BMW | Dodge |
Model | 520 | Kahuna |
Year Released | 1995 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1989 cc | 2429 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 212 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 339 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4700 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1710 mm |