1995 BMW 528 vs. 1963 DKW Munga
To start off, 1995 BMW 528 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 2,793 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 BMW 528 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW 528 (193 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 150 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW 528 should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 BMW 528 weights approximately 470 kg more than 1963 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 BMW 528. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 BMW 528 | 1963 DKW Munga | |
| Make | BMW | DKW |
| Model | 528 | Munga |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2793 cc | 980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 193 HP | 43 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3950 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 76.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 74 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 8.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1580 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 3450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 31 L |
