1995 BMW 840 vs. 2001 Mazda CU-X
To start off, 2001 Mazda CU-X is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 BMW 840. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 BMW 840 would be higher. At 3,982 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 BMW 840 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW 840 (282 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 183 more horse power than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW 840 should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda CU-X. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 BMW 840 weights approximately 395 kg more than 2001 Mazda CU-X. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1995 BMW 840 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 BMW 840. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mazda CU-X, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 BMW 840 (400 Nm) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (240 Nm). This means 1995 BMW 840 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mazda CU-X.
Compare all specifications:
1995 BMW 840 | 2001 Mazda CU-X | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | 840 | CU-X |
Year Released | 1995 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3982 cc | 1970 cc |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1740 kg | 1345 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 80 L |