1995 BMW 840 vs. 2003 Tata E
To start off, 2003 Tata E is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 BMW 840. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 BMW 840 would be higher. At 3,982 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 BMW 840 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW 840 (282 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 2003 Tata E. (148 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW 840 should accelerate faster than 2003 Tata E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 BMW 840 weights approximately 366 kg more than 2003 Tata E. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 BMW 840 (400 Nm @ 5100 RPM) has 190 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Tata E. (210 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1995 BMW 840 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Tata E.
Compare all specifications:
1995 BMW 840 | 2003 Tata E | |
Make | BMW | Tata |
Model | 840 | E |
Year Released | 1995 | 2003 |
Engine Size | 3982 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 210 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5100 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1740 kg | 1374 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2810 mm |