1995 BMW CLS vs. 1953 Jaguar C-Type
To start off, 1995 BMW CLS is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Jaguar C-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Jaguar C-Type would be higher. At 3,440 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Jaguar C-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW CLS (350 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 1953 Jaguar C-Type. (217 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW CLS should accelerate faster than 1953 Jaguar C-Type.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1953 Jaguar C-Type (330 Nm) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 BMW CLS. (260 Nm). This means 1953 Jaguar C-Type will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 BMW CLS.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 BMW CLS | 1953 Jaguar C-Type | |
| Make | BMW | Jaguar |
| Model | CLS | C-Type |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1953 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3001 cc | 3440 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 217 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 260 Nm | 330 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1540 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2450 mm |
