1995 BMW CLS vs. 1955 Buick 40
To start off, 1995 BMW CLS is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,277 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW CLS (350 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 1955 Buick 40. (234 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW CLS should accelerate faster than 1955 Buick 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1955 Buick 40 (447 Nm) has 187 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 BMW CLS. (260 Nm). This means 1955 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 BMW CLS.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 BMW CLS | 1955 Buick 40 | |
| Make | BMW | Buick |
| Model | CLS | 40 |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1955 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3001 cc | 5277 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 234 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 260 Nm | 447 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3110 mm |
