1995 BMW CLS vs. 1955 Jeep CJ5
To start off, 1995 BMW CLS is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 3,001 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 BMW CLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW CLS (350 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 291 more horse power than 1955 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW CLS should accelerate faster than 1955 Jeep CJ5.
Because 1955 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 BMW CLS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1955 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 BMW CLS (260 Nm) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 Jeep CJ5. (145 Nm). This means 1995 BMW CLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 Jeep CJ5.
Compare all specifications:
1995 BMW CLS | 1955 Jeep CJ5 | |
Make | BMW | Jeep |
Model | CLS | CJ5 |
Year Released | 1995 | 1955 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3001 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 260 Nm | 145 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2060 mm |