1995 BMW CLS vs. 1956 Chrysler C
To start off, 1995 BMW CLS is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Chrysler C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Chrysler C would be higher. At 5,801 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 Chrysler C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW CLS (350 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1956 Chrysler C. (335 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW CLS should accelerate faster than 1956 Chrysler C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1956 Chrysler C (530 Nm) has 270 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 BMW CLS. (260 Nm). This means 1956 Chrysler C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 BMW CLS.
Compare all specifications:
1995 BMW CLS | 1956 Chrysler C | |
Make | BMW | Chrysler |
Model | CLS | C |
Year Released | 1995 | 1956 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3001 cc | 5801 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 335 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 260 Nm | 530 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3210 mm |