1995 BMW CLS vs. 1959 Holden FE
To start off, 1995 BMW CLS is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Holden FE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Holden FE would be higher. At 3,001 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 BMW CLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW CLS (350 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 290 more horse power than 1959 Holden FE. (60 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW CLS should accelerate faster than 1959 Holden FE.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 BMW CLS (260 Nm) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Holden FE. (150 Nm). This means 1995 BMW CLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Holden FE.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 BMW CLS | 1959 Holden FE | |
| Make | BMW | Holden |
| Model | CLS | FE |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1959 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3001 cc | 2166 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 260 Nm | 150 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2670 mm |
