1995 BMW CLS vs. 1961 Cadillac Biarritz
To start off, 1995 BMW CLS is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac Biarritz. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac Biarritz would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac Biarritz is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW CLS (350 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 153 more horse power than 1961 Cadillac Biarritz. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW CLS should accelerate faster than 1961 Cadillac Biarritz.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 Cadillac Biarritz (582 Nm) has 322 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 BMW CLS. (260 Nm). This means 1961 Cadillac Biarritz will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 BMW CLS.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 BMW CLS | 1961 Cadillac Biarritz | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | CLS | Biarritz |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1961 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3001 cc | 6390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 260 Nm | 582 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 2050 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3300 mm |
