1995 BMW CLS vs. 1966 Volvo 144
To start off, 1995 BMW CLS is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Volvo 144. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Volvo 144 would be higher. At 3,001 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 BMW CLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW CLS (350 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 226 more horse power than 1966 Volvo 144. (124 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW CLS should accelerate faster than 1966 Volvo 144.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 BMW CLS (260 Nm) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Volvo 144. (167 Nm). This means 1995 BMW CLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Volvo 144.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 BMW CLS | 1966 Volvo 144 | |
| Make | BMW | Volvo |
| Model | CLS | 144 |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3001 cc | 1986 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 124 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 260 Nm | 167 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2620 mm |
