1995 BMW CLS vs. 1968 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1995 BMW CLS is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 3,001 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 BMW CLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW CLS (350 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 241 more horse power than 1968 Nissan Cedric. (109 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW CLS should accelerate faster than 1968 Nissan Cedric.
Let's talk about torque, 1995 BMW CLS (260 Nm) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Nissan Cedric. (197 Nm). This means 1995 BMW CLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 BMW CLS | 1968 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | BMW | Nissan |
| Model | CLS | Cedric |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3001 cc | 2393 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 109 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 260 Nm | 197 Nm |
| Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2700 mm |
