1995 BMW CLS vs. 1972 Chrysler Charger
To start off, 1995 BMW CLS is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Chrysler Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Chrysler Charger would be higher. At 5,561 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Chrysler Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW CLS (350 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1972 Chrysler Charger. (276 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW CLS should accelerate faster than 1972 Chrysler Charger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Chrysler Charger (459 Nm) has 199 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 BMW CLS. (260 Nm). This means 1972 Chrysler Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 BMW CLS.
Compare all specifications:
1995 BMW CLS | 1972 Chrysler Charger | |
Make | BMW | Chrysler |
Model | CLS | Charger |
Year Released | 1995 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3001 cc | 5561 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 276 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 260 Nm | 459 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2680 mm |