1995 BMW CLS vs. 1973 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 1995 BMW CLS is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Jaguar XJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Jaguar XJ would be higher. At 5,344 cc (12 cylinders), 1973 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW CLS (350 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 1973 Jaguar XJ. (251 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW CLS should accelerate faster than 1973 Jaguar XJ.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Jaguar XJ (409 Nm) has 149 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 BMW CLS. (260 Nm). This means 1973 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 BMW CLS. 1973 Jaguar XJ has automatic transmission and 1995 BMW CLS has manual transmission. 1995 BMW CLS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1973 Jaguar XJ will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1995 BMW CLS | 1973 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | BMW | Jaguar |
Model | CLS | XJ |
Year Released | 1995 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3001 cc | 5344 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 251 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 260 Nm | 409 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2770 mm |