1995 BMW CLS vs. 1980 Dodge Aspen
To start off, 1995 BMW CLS is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Dodge Aspen. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Dodge Aspen would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Dodge Aspen is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW CLS (350 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 249 more horse power than 1980 Dodge Aspen. (101 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW CLS should accelerate faster than 1980 Dodge Aspen.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 BMW CLS (260 Nm) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Dodge Aspen. (231 Nm). This means 1995 BMW CLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Dodge Aspen.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 BMW CLS | 1980 Dodge Aspen | |
| Make | BMW | Dodge |
| Model | CLS | Aspen |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3001 cc | 3687 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 101 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 260 Nm | 231 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1870 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2760 mm |
