1995 BMW CLS vs. 1982 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1995 BMW CLS is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 3,001 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 BMW CLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW CLS (350 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 249 more horse power than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. (101 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW CLS should accelerate faster than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 BMW CLS (260 Nm) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. (192 Nm). This means 1995 BMW CLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro.
Compare all specifications:
1995 BMW CLS | 1982 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | CLS | Camaro |
Year Released | 1995 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3001 cc | 2835 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 260 Nm | 192 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2580 mm |