1995 BMW CLS vs. 1982 Jeep CJ7
To start off, 1995 BMW CLS is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Jeep CJ7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Jeep CJ7 would be higher. At 3,001 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 BMW CLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW CLS (350 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 291 more horse power than 1982 Jeep CJ7. (59 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW CLS should accelerate faster than 1982 Jeep CJ7.
Because 1982 Jeep CJ7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 BMW CLS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Jeep CJ7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 BMW CLS (260 Nm) has 132 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Jeep CJ7. (128 Nm). This means 1995 BMW CLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Jeep CJ7.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 BMW CLS | 1982 Jeep CJ7 | |
| Make | BMW | Jeep |
| Model | CLS | CJ7 |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3001 cc | 2068 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 260 Nm | 128 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1840 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2380 mm |
