1995 BMW CLS vs. 1982 Opel Ascona
To start off, 1995 BMW CLS is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Opel Ascona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Opel Ascona would be higher. At 3,001 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 BMW CLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW CLS (350 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 235 more horse power than 1982 Opel Ascona. (115 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW CLS should accelerate faster than 1982 Opel Ascona.
Because 1995 BMW CLS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 BMW CLS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Opel Ascona, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 BMW CLS (260 Nm) has 106 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Opel Ascona. (154 Nm). This means 1995 BMW CLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Opel Ascona.
Compare all specifications:
1995 BMW CLS | 1982 Opel Ascona | |
Make | BMW | Opel |
Model | CLS | Ascona |
Year Released | 1995 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3001 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 115 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 260 Nm | 154 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2740 mm |