1995 BMW CLS vs. 1982 Plymouth Reliant
To start off, 1995 BMW CLS is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Plymouth Reliant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Plymouth Reliant would be higher. At 3,001 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 BMW CLS is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1995 BMW CLS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 BMW CLS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Plymouth Reliant, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 BMW CLS | 1982 Plymouth Reliant | |
| Make | BMW | Plymouth |
| Model | CLS | Reliant |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3001 cc | 2498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2260 mm |
