1995 BMW CLS vs. 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1995 BMW CLS is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,001 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 BMW CLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW CLS (350 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 191 more horse power than 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (159 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW CLS should accelerate faster than 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 1995 BMW CLS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 BMW CLS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 BMW CLS (260 Nm) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (203 Nm). This means 1995 BMW CLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Compare all specifications:
1995 BMW CLS | 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | BMW | Oldsmobile |
Model | CLS | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1995 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3001 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 159 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 260 Nm | 203 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2740 mm |