1995 BMW CLS vs. 1991 Fiat Tempra
To start off, 1995 BMW CLS is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Fiat Tempra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Fiat Tempra would be higher. At 3,001 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 BMW CLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW CLS (350 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 286 more horse power than 1991 Fiat Tempra. (64 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW CLS should accelerate faster than 1991 Fiat Tempra.
Because 1995 BMW CLS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 BMW CLS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Fiat Tempra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 BMW CLS (260 Nm) has 141 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Fiat Tempra. (119 Nm). This means 1995 BMW CLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Fiat Tempra.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 BMW CLS | 1991 Fiat Tempra | |
| Make | BMW | Fiat |
| Model | CLS | Tempra |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1991 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3001 cc | 1929 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 64 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 260 Nm | 119 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1450 mm |
