1995 BMW CLS vs. 1992 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1995 BMW CLS is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 3,135 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW CLS (350 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 212 more horse power than 1992 Chevrolet Camaro. (138 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW CLS should accelerate faster than 1992 Chevrolet Camaro.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 BMW CLS (260 Nm) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Chevrolet Camaro. (244 Nm). This means 1995 BMW CLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Chevrolet Camaro.
Compare all specifications:
1995 BMW CLS | 1992 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | CLS | Camaro |
Year Released | 1995 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3001 cc | 3135 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 260 Nm | 244 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2570 mm |