1995 BMW CLS vs. 1992 Jaguar XJS
To start off, 1995 BMW CLS is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Jaguar XJS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Jaguar XJS would be higher. At 3,980 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Jaguar XJS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW CLS (350 HP) has 128 more horse power than 1992 Jaguar XJS. (222 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW CLS should accelerate faster than 1992 Jaguar XJS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 BMW CLS | 1992 Jaguar XJS | |
Make | BMW | Jaguar |
Model | CLS | XJS |
Year Released | 1995 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3001 cc | 3980 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 222 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2600 mm |