1995 BMW CLS vs. 1992 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1995 BMW CLS is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 3,001 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 BMW CLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW CLS (350 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 187 more horse power than 1992 Lotus Elan. (163 HP @ 6600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW CLS should accelerate faster than 1992 Lotus Elan.
Because 1995 BMW CLS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 BMW CLS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Lotus Elan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 BMW CLS (260 Nm) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Lotus Elan. (204 Nm). This means 1995 BMW CLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Lotus Elan.
Compare all specifications:
1995 BMW CLS | 1992 Lotus Elan | |
Make | BMW | Lotus |
Model | CLS | Elan |
Year Released | 1995 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3001 cc | 1587 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Torque | 260 Nm | 204 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1240 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2260 mm |