1995 BMW CLS vs. 1996 Acura TL
To start off, 1996 Acura TL is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 BMW CLS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 BMW CLS would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW CLS (350 HP) has 150 more horse power than 1996 Acura TL. (200 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW CLS should accelerate faster than 1996 Acura TL.
Because 1995 BMW CLS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 BMW CLS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Acura TL has automatic transmission and 1995 BMW CLS has manual transmission. 1995 BMW CLS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Acura TL will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 BMW CLS | 1996 Acura TL | |
| Make | BMW | Acura |
| Model | CLS | TL |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3001 cc | 3200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 200 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1786 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1405 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2840 mm |
