1995 BMW CLS vs. 1996 Mazda MPV
To start off, 1996 Mazda MPV is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 BMW CLS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 BMW CLS would be higher. At 3,001 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 BMW CLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW CLS (350 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 236 more horse power than 1996 Mazda MPV. (114 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW CLS should accelerate faster than 1996 Mazda MPV.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mazda MPV (277 Nm) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 BMW CLS. (260 Nm). This means 1996 Mazda MPV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 BMW CLS.
Compare all specifications:
1995 BMW CLS | 1996 Mazda MPV | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | CLS | MPV |
Year Released | 1995 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3001 cc | 2498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Torque | 260 Nm | 277 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2850 mm |