1995 BMW CLS vs. 1996 Mazda RX-01
To start off, 1996 Mazda RX-01 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 BMW CLS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 BMW CLS would be higher. At 3,001 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 BMW CLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW CLS (350 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 1996 Mazda RX-01. (217 HP @ 8500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW CLS should accelerate faster than 1996 Mazda RX-01.
Because 1995 BMW CLS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 BMW CLS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mazda RX-01, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 BMW CLS (260 Nm) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda RX-01. (220 Nm). This means 1995 BMW CLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda RX-01.
Compare all specifications:
1995 BMW CLS | 1996 Mazda RX-01 | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | CLS | RX-01 |
Year Released | 1995 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3001 cc | 2615 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 217 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 8500 RPM |
Torque | 260 Nm | 220 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2350 mm |