1995 BMW CLS vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Pajero

To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi Pajero is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 BMW CLS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 BMW CLS would be higher. At 3,497 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi Pajero is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW CLS (350 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 145 more horse power than 1996 Mitsubishi Pajero. (205 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW CLS should accelerate faster than 1996 Mitsubishi Pajero.

Because 1996 Mitsubishi Pajero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 BMW CLS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Pajero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mitsubishi Pajero (300 Nm) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 BMW CLS. (260 Nm). This means 1996 Mitsubishi Pajero will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 BMW CLS. 1996 Mitsubishi Pajero has automatic transmission and 1995 BMW CLS has manual transmission. 1995 BMW CLS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Mitsubishi Pajero will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: