1995 BMW CLS vs. 1997 Ford F-250
To start off, 1997 Ford F-250 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 BMW CLS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 BMW CLS would be higher. At 6,800 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW CLS (350 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1997 Ford F-250. (306 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW CLS should accelerate faster than 1997 Ford F-250.
Because 1997 Ford F-250 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 BMW CLS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Ford F-250 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Ford F-250 (575 Nm) has 315 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 BMW CLS. (260 Nm). This means 1997 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 BMW CLS. 1997 Ford F-250 has automatic transmission and 1995 BMW CLS has manual transmission. 1995 BMW CLS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1997 Ford F-250 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1995 BMW CLS | 1997 Ford F-250 | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | CLS | F-250 |
Year Released | 1995 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3001 cc | 6800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 306 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Torque | 260 Nm | 575 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3490 mm |