1995 BMW CLS vs. 1998 Mazda Laputa
To start off, 1998 Mazda Laputa is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 BMW CLS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 BMW CLS would be higher. At 3,001 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 BMW CLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW CLS (350 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 293 more horse power than 1998 Mazda Laputa. (57 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW CLS should accelerate faster than 1998 Mazda Laputa.
Because 1998 Mazda Laputa is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 BMW CLS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Mazda Laputa will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 BMW CLS (260 Nm) has 177 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Mazda Laputa. (83 Nm). This means 1995 BMW CLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Mazda Laputa.
Compare all specifications:
1995 BMW CLS | 1998 Mazda Laputa | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | CLS | Laputa |
Year Released | 1995 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3001 cc | 658 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 57 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 260 Nm | 83 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2370 mm |