1995 BMW CLS vs. 1999 Jaguar XK
To start off, 1999 Jaguar XK is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 BMW CLS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 BMW CLS would be higher. At 3,996 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW CLS (350 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1999 Jaguar XK. (290 HP @ 6100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW CLS should accelerate faster than 1999 Jaguar XK.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Jaguar XK (393 Nm) has 133 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 BMW CLS. (260 Nm). This means 1999 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 BMW CLS. 1999 Jaguar XK has automatic transmission and 1995 BMW CLS has manual transmission. 1995 BMW CLS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Jaguar XK will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 BMW CLS | 1999 Jaguar XK | |
| Make | BMW | Jaguar |
| Model | CLS | XK |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3001 cc | 3996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 290 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Torque | 260 Nm | 393 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1320 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2600 mm |
