1995 BMW CLS vs. 2000 Caterham 21
To start off, 2000 Caterham 21 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 BMW CLS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 BMW CLS would be higher. At 3,001 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 BMW CLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW CLS (350 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 2000 Caterham 21. (230 HP @ 8600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW CLS should accelerate faster than 2000 Caterham 21.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 BMW CLS (260 Nm) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Caterham 21. (210 Nm). This means 1995 BMW CLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Caterham 21.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 BMW CLS | 2000 Caterham 21 | |
| Make | BMW | Caterham |
| Model | CLS | 21 |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3001 cc | 1794 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 230 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 8600 RPM |
| Torque | 260 Nm | 210 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 1590 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2230 mm |
