1995 BMW CLS vs. 2000 Ford Excursion
To start off, 2000 Ford Excursion is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 BMW CLS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 BMW CLS would be higher. At 5,406 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford Excursion is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 BMW CLS (350 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 2000 Ford Excursion. (252 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 BMW CLS should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Excursion.
Because 2000 Ford Excursion is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 BMW CLS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford Excursion will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Excursion (474 Nm) has 214 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 BMW CLS. (260 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Excursion will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 BMW CLS. 2000 Ford Excursion has automatic transmission and 1995 BMW CLS has manual transmission. 1995 BMW CLS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford Excursion will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1995 BMW CLS | 2000 Ford Excursion | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | CLS | Excursion |
Year Released | 1995 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3001 cc | 5406 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 252 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 260 Nm | 474 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Width | 1360 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 2050 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3490 mm |